Re: let authors choose text/html or application/xhtml+xml (detailed review of section 1. Introduction)

On 8/31/07, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> wrote:
> Also, I don't think "using an XML MIME type such as" is specific
> enough, because types such as application/rdf+xml obviously aren't
> appropriate.  As for application/xml, well, it isn't universally
> understood[1] that the root namespace is special so I wouldn't
> recommend its use.  That might change in the future, but for now, I'd
> leave it out.  One media type should be good enough anyhow.

Oops, I forgot the link.

 [1] http://www.markbaker.ca/2004/01/XmlDispatchTest/

But lightning took out my Internet connection Wednesday night, so
here's Google's cached version until it returns;

http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache:Tyj_DGNoqjQJ:www.markbaker.ca/2004/01/XmlDispatchTest/

Mark.
-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.         http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies  http://www.coactus.com