W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: 3.8.10. The address element

From: Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 00:25:00 +1000
Message-ID: <5f37426b0708070725r3abaea11t268413ca79726003@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>

Yes, it's a HTML4 hangup... I still don't understand why though and
would like it changed. Perhaps not a very compelling argument, but I
stand by "I would like to structure address information using lists
and tables where appropriate". For example, you may have multiple
contacts (e.g. regional offices) and wish to use a table to present
that information. You can use a table, or address, but not both (not
if you care about conformance).

Here's the HTML 4.01 reference, showing address has an inline content model.

On 8/8/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 16:04:04 +0200, Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > 2. Would anyone else like the content model of address broadened? I
> > would like to be able to structure contact details using lists and
> > tables (when appropriate) and to do this within address tags. The
> > "paragraph" model is restrictive and I don't understand the reasons
> > for the restriction.
> Seems to be compatible with HTML4 and Firefox which implies </address> for
> a number of start tags like <table> and <ol>. (Though in other browsers
> such as Opera and Internet Explorer you can nest such elements safely
> inside <address>.)
> --
> Anne van Kesteren
> <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2007 14:25:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:25 UTC