W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature)

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:50:12 -0700
Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Mihai Sucan <mihai.sucan@gmail.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <577B93A9-C906-485A-9B28-6E9B1B26B37F@apple.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>

On Aug 3, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Jirka Kosek wrote:
>>> I'm not sure what it is. One possibility I've considered is to just
>>> have two conformance levels, "conforming html5 document" and
>>> "conforming low-quality html5 document", with <font>, style="", and
>>> <div>s-containing-inlines kicking documents into the second  
>>> category.
>> Why then not just reuse already existing and familiar names
>> Strict/Transitional for these two comformance levels?
> Mostly because there's nothing "transitional" about <font>,  
> style="", and
> <div>s-containing-inlines, and also because "transitional" doesn't  
> have
> the same connotations as "low quality".

What exactly is "low quality" about these constructs, relative to  
other constructs that would not be tagged this way?

Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 22:50:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:03 GMT