- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:50:12 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Mihai Sucan <mihai.sucan@gmail.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Aug 3, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Jirka Kosek wrote: >>> >>> I'm not sure what it is. One possibility I've considered is to just >>> have two conformance levels, "conforming html5 document" and >>> "conforming low-quality html5 document", with <font>, style="", and >>> <div>s-containing-inlines kicking documents into the second >>> category. >> >> Why then not just reuse already existing and familiar names >> Strict/Transitional for these two comformance levels? > > Mostly because there's nothing "transitional" about <font>, > style="", and > <div>s-containing-inlines, and also because "transitional" doesn't > have > the same connotations as "low quality". What exactly is "low quality" about these constructs, relative to other constructs that would not be tagged this way? Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 22:50:26 UTC