W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:35:37 +0200
To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>, "Mihai Sucan" <mihai.sucan@gmail.com>
Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.twhj1nz964w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:28:09 +0200, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote:
> If anyone can state the use-case / problem statement on this editor
> signature, that would be very helpful.

As stated in the draft, it's to allow validators to not mark <font>  
elements as being non-conforming. I don't believe many people are  
convinced this section of the draft is a particularly good solution to the  
"WYSIWYG problem" though. There have been some suggestions on the WHATWG  
list by Henri Sivonen iirc on how to improve this.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 13:35:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:25 UTC