W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: 3.8.10. The address element

From: Ben Boyle <benjamins.boyle@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 19:14:32 +1000
Message-ID: <5f37426b0708080214m11e333aaj4af87f10cb214b2a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
Cc: Smylers <Smylers@stripey.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>

On 8/8/07, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Smylers wrote:
> > Which bit reads like that to you?  Contrast, for example, <aside>
> > which
> > is described as:
> >
> >   Sectioning block-level element
> >
> > with <address> as:
> >
> >   Block-level element

I'm with Rob on this. Smylers, what you've pointed out is very clear,
yet placing them all in the chapter about "sections" has fooled me. I
think they could just be grouped into a subsection of "elements
supporting sections" which would be: h1-6, address, header, footer...

# 3.8.7. The h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, and h6 elements
# 3.8.8. The header element
# 3.8.9. The footer element
# 3.8.10. The address element

could possibly become:

# 3.8.7. Element supporting sections
# 3.8.7.1. The h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, and h6 elements
# 3.8.7.2. The header element
# 3.8.7.3. The footer element
# 3.8.7.4. The address element

(just one suggestion for changing, open to anything that clarifies it further).
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 09:14:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:48 UTC