Sorry, I seem to have removed a line from my message : the corrupted part was intended to read -- > You speak of "theoretical purity" as if it has negative connotations, > and there I do not agree : we have only to look at the expansion > of HTML to determine its intended r\^ole -- it is a HyperText /Markup/ > Language, rather than > You speak of "theoretical purity" as if it has negative connotations, > and there I do not agree : we r\^ole -- it is a HyperText /Markup/ > Language, as it was posted. Philip TAYLORReceived on Friday, 31 August 2007 11:55:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 11 September 2008 22:52:06 GMT