W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: 3.8. Sections

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:35:43 +0200
To: "Sander Tekelenburg" <st@isoc.nl>, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.twqtdtq764w2qv@annevk-t60.oslo.opera.com>

On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:23:05 +0200, Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl> wrote:
> So I'masking if, given that, it is really necessary to speak of
> "nearest ancestor sectioning element", or that "parent sectioning  
> element" would cover the same. ("Parent" is likely to be understood by  
> more people
> than "nearest ancestor".)

That sounds confusing to me because it doesn't actually define the  
constraints you seem to be working with such that non-sectioning elements  
are to be ignored in usage of "parent".


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 13:36:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:48 UTC