Re: 3.8. Sections

On 8/8/07, Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl> wrote:
>
> At 00:05 +1000 UTC, on 2007-08-08, Ben Boyle wrote:
>
> > http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#sections
>
> [...]
>
> > "nearest ancestor sectioning element" vs "nearest sectioning element"
> > - I'd stick with the former for clarity, the "ancestor" part is
> > fundamental.
>
> Can it occur that "nearest ancestor" != "parent"?

I think so. You could have something like section > div > address
perhaps, where the parent "div" is not a sectioning element.