On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:29:32 +0200, Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> wrote: > My main difficulty here is with the classification of features as > "accessibility-specific", which gives too narrow a conception of the > applications in which those features are, or may be, useful. Although > there may be arguments for features that specifically support assistive > technologies, such as @role, I think they are the exception and that > measures taken to improve "accessibility" typically have broader > benefits, as long as one is willing to think beyond the "graphical > desktop browsers" paradigm. The problem Maciej and others are trying to point out, I think, is that most authors will not think beyond the "graphical desktop browsers" paradigm. In fact, they will only test in a single browser and that's that. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2007 08:27:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:03 GMT