W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Distributed Extensibility

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:56:46 -0500
To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>, public-html@w3.org
Message-Id: <1186163806.15648.276.camel@pav>

On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 15:42 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2007, at 18:16, Sam Ruby wrote:
[...]
> >     * The notion of “enclosing element” is problematic in the face  
> > of adoption agency algorithms and the like.  The prudent thing to  
> > do is to define any case where reparenting would change the meaning  
> > of any element to be a (recoverable) error.  This would affect very  
> > few users or documents.  It would be a bitch to code in a  
> > conformance checker, but that’s not the spec’s writer’s concern.  :-)
> 
> Reparenting is already an error.

Care to elaborate? If anybody has a moment to walk me/us thru the
relevant parts of the spec, or just point to it, I'd appreciate it.

[...]
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 3 August 2007 17:56:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:03 GMT