- From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 23:56:38 -0500
- To: Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Aug 3, 2007, at 11:44 PM, Jason White wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:06:25PM -0500, Robert Burns wrote: > >> Does this mean your proposal specifies a content model of "block- >> level or >> inline, but not both" (I'm still trying to understand what >> transparent >> means so perhaps that's the exact same thing). > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/html5/#transparent (sec. 3.3.3.3) Yes, I've read the draft. It's another one of those sections that's in serious need of clarification. Is your reading of that section such that "block-level or inline-level elements but not both" is the content model you're proposing for ALT? Or is that a different content model? Take care, Rob PS, there's a very unfortunate habit on this list of using URLs as an explanation or to make a point without any further explanation. That's a very poor way to communicate. AT the very least we should each provide a quotation of the relevant sentence, phrase, or paragraph and a brief explanation of what the cited source implies about the discussion.
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 04:56:44 UTC