- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:50:22 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
At 15:35 +0200 UTC, on 2007-08-08, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:23:05 +0200, Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl> wrote: [... "parent sectioning element" instead of "nearest ancestor sectioning element"] > That sounds confusing to me because it doesn't actually define the > constraints you seem to be working with such that non-sectioning elements > are to be ignored in usage of "parent". I can't follow. How does "parent sectioning element" leave room to think it might apply to a non-sectioning parent element? -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 13:54:28 UTC