W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: 3.8. Sections

From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:50:22 +0200
Message-Id: <p06240624c2df79d92421@[192.168.0.101]>
To: public-html@w3.org

At 15:35 +0200 UTC, on 2007-08-08, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:23:05 +0200, Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl> wrote:

[... "parent sectioning element" instead of "nearest ancestor sectioning
element"]

> That sounds confusing to me because it doesn't actually define the
> constraints you seem to be working with such that non-sectioning elements
> are to be ignored in usage of "parent".

I can't follow. How does "parent sectioning element" leave room to think it
might apply to a non-sectioning parent element?


-- 
Sander Tekelenburg
The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 13:54:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:48 UTC