- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:51:20 +0100
- To: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: > > The definition for |ol| and |ul| says that they represent an "ordered > list of items" and an "unordered list of items". It doesn't say in what > way they are ordered. Should the definition be refined to something like > "A list where the order of the items has meaning."? How is that better than "an ordered list" ? The latter is idiomatic, widely used and widely understood; your re-casting may be preferable in terms of Basic English, but I am not convinced that technical specifications can or should be expressed in B.E. Philip TAYLOR
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2007 16:51:42 UTC