- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@comcast.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:54:05 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
Yes, Jaws is horrible which is why I've invested considerable time, effort and $ in MAC. It doesn't have all the niceties of JAWS, but it works mostly well and is getting better at the important things. On Aug 30, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Sander Tekelenburg wrote: not to flood <wai-xtech@w3.org>] At 13:18 -0400 UTC, on 2007-08-30, Al Gilman wrote: [...] > There are two reasons why the things the WAI asks for sound very > abstract: > > 1) people with disabilities vary widely in their needs, and there are > years of experience in assistive technology and universal design > that have gone into distilling a common-mode abstraction of what > the client side needs from the content production and server segment. Are you saying you have input from real actual flesh and blood developers of Jaws and such? Can you get them to participate in the HTML WG? The theory is important, but without input from the practice side, we aren't going to get anywhere. What Gregory just explained about Jaws 8 looks even more horrible than what I'd seen of it (Jaws 4). We need to know why Jaws is so horrible, or else we can't do much for it. -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Friday, 31 August 2007 04:54:16 UTC