W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: 9. WYSIWYG editor (enforcing the signature) detailed review of

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 15:46:33 +0200
To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: "Mihai Sucan" <mihai.sucan@gmail.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.twje7vtlidj3kv@hp-a0a83fcd39d2>

On Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:23:38 +0200, Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com> wrote:

>> As stated in the draft, it's to allow validators to not mark <font>  
>> elements as being non-conforming. I don't believe many people are  
>> convinced this section of the draft is a particularly good solution to  
>> the "WYSIWYG problem" though. There have been some suggestions on the  
>> WHATWG list by Henri Sivonen iirc on how to improve this.
>
> Is this the message of Henri's you're referring to?
>
> <http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-January/ 
> 009067.html>

Probably; also see:

    http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2007-May/011181.html

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Saturday, 4 August 2007 13:46:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:03 GMT