W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: Assertions regarding the quality of HTML documents

From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:45:16 +0200
Message-Id: <p06240617c2dcb849c3d2@[]>
To: public-html@w3.org

At 19:33 +1000 UTC, on 2007-08-06, Jason White wrote:


> See http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10/ for a language that formalizes such quality
> claims.  EARL 1.0 has been implemented in evaluation tools.

I know. I haven't really looked into EARL myself yet., but CTIC, one of the
partners of The Web Repair Initiative, is heavily involved in EARL.

So yes, it did occur to me that such a dedicated language would be ideal. I
just thought it might be possible to (also) have something simpler that would
still be useful.

Sander Tekelenburg
The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 11:53:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:25 UTC