- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2007 13:45:16 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
At 19:33 +1000 UTC, on 2007-08-06, Jason White wrote: [...] > See http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10/ for a language that formalizes such quality > claims. EARL 1.0 has been implemented in evaluation tools. I know. I haven't really looked into EARL myself yet., but CTIC, one of the partners of The Web Repair Initiative, is heavily involved in EARL. So yes, it did occur to me that such a dedicated language would be ideal. I just thought it might be possible to (also) have something simpler that would still be useful. -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Monday, 6 August 2007 11:53:55 UTC