W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: User Testing of Accessiblity Features

From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 12:11:18 +0100
Message-ID: <46D6A5D6.3050300@cfit.ie>
To: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>
Cc: Alastair Campbell <ac@nomensa.com>, "Tighe K. Lory" <tkl02@health.state.ny.us>, WAI Interest Group list <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>

Olivier GENDRIN wrote:
>>> And my colleague Léonie would argue that if the image conveys something (even "just" emotive), then she would like to know it's there and what it is supposed to represent.
>>>
>>> That demonstrates the hard-core usability vs holistic experience divide quite nicely.[...]

> So it leads directly to have alt even on CSS background images,
> because of emotion...

This is interesting. Alastair mentions his colleague Leonie who would
prefer to have some description of an image - even if a sighted person
would perceive it as eye candy - and Olivier brings up the point "where
do you draw the line"? I know several blind friends and colleagues who
really would not care if they did not get a description of a decorative
image or feel they were missing anything if the full emotional nuance of
a design was not imparted to them. They are by and large only interested
in accessing content or performing a task. So the issue is rather moot
and context dependent.

However, facilitating all of these points of view and requirements
within the remit of the specification is the challenge.

Josh
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 11:11:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:04 GMT