W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

RE: Baby Steps or Backwards Steps?

From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:01:40 -0700
To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>, scott lewis <sfl@scotfl.ca>
Message-ID: <5C276AFCCD083E4F94BD5C2DA883F05A27F7911C60@tk5-exmlt-w600.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>

Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote:
>then why don't those who complain about microsoft having "broken"
>object formally ask the microsoft Advisory Council rep to make
>MSIE standards compliant, so that we could use OBJECT and avoid
>the code bloat of VIDEO, AUDIO, etc. --

Could someone describe the exact issue, and tell me if it is still present in IE7?  I know we still don't deal with 404 errors properly, but OBJECT fallback was dramatically improved in IE7.

-Chris
Received on Monday, 20 August 2007 17:01:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:04 GMT