W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: [HDP] Other comments from RI

From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:27:38 +0100
Message-ID: <46D414BA.3080509@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
CC: Olivier GENDRIN <olivier.gendrin@gmail.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>



Lachlan Hunt wrote:

 > [snip]

> It basically comes down to considering the cost vs. benefit of each 
> specific change.  Some changes may turn out to be incompatible with some 
> particular browsers, even if those browsers are relatively significant, 
> yet sometimes the benefit far outweighs the cost.  For example, 
> something may be incompatible with Firefox 2.0, but be fully compatible 
> with the development versions of Firefox 3.0 and so it may be worth 
> sacrificing a little bit of graceful degradation for the feature.

So if I may attempt to summarise, you propose being
pragmatic rather than scientific ?

Philip TAYLOR
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2007 12:28:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:48 UTC