W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > August 2007

Re: HEADERS, FOR whom - any ID?

From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 02:45:38 +0200
Message-Id: <p0624062dc2e00fdbe38e@[]>
To: <public-html@w3.org>

At 18:57 -0500 UTC, on 2007-08-08, Robert Burns wrote:

> On Aug 8, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Sander Tekelenburg wrote:


> Perhaps the attribute belongs on the FIELDSET element too. I'm still
> trying to think through the structure.

Could be useful to be allowed to set it on <fieldset>, yes. Provided it can
be overridden per individual label.

[... <label>blah<control1><control2></label>]

>> I'm just wondering how the UA might convey that. Which of the two
>> controls should be activated when the label is 'clicked'? Or should
>> it not activate but do something else?
> [...] For other controls, I don't think
> clicking activates so much as focuses.

Agreed. I shouldn't have said "activate".

> In that case it could just
> focus on the first of the controls.

But then you'd need to keep @for or else you'd break 'my' use case where the
label really make much more sense to refer to the last control.

Sander Tekelenburg
The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2007 00:50:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:25 UTC