public-html@w3.org from July 2007 by date

Tuesday, 31 July 2007

Re: Reality Check: Bi-polar Accessibility Disorder (BAD) Dave Singer
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Karl Dubost
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) T.V Raman
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Robert Burns
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint T.V Raman
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Robert Burns
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) T.V Raman
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) T.V Raman
Re: ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Reality Check: Bi-polar Accessibility Disorder (BAD) Joshue O Connor
Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing Robert Burns
ID Characters (was: Re: 3.4. Global attributes) Jim Jewett
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint James Graham
including sufficient authoring norms in the draft Robert Burns
Re: 3.5.2. Focus Jon Barnett
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Robert Burns
Re: HTML 5 proposal - OBJECT elements, environment discovery and alternative content Kornel Lesinski
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Charles McCathieNevile
Re: <table presentation="pie"> Patrick H. Lauke
HTML 5 proposal - OBJECT elements, environment discovery and alternative content Philip Ronan
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Laura Carlson
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
Re: 3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing Thomas Broyer
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Philip Taylor
3.12.8 dfn automatic cross-referencing Ben Boyle
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Jon Barnett
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? David Poehlman
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Laura Carlson
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Ben Boyle
<table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: <table presentation="pie"> (was: Re: <table chart="pie">) Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: popularization of Unicode (was: Re[4]: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG)) Dmitry Turin
Re: Patterns for explicit associations Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Ben Boyle
Namespace declarations in application/xhtml+xml (Re: 3.6. The root element) Henri Sivonen
Re: 3.4. Global attributes Sander Tekelenburg
RE: Accesskey - spec proposal Marcin Hanclik
Re: CR and LF in the input stream / as NCRs (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Simon Pieters
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: 3.6. The root element Ben Boyle
Re: 3.6. The root element Thomas Broyer
Re: 3.6. The root element Anne van Kesteren
3.5.2. Focus Marcin Hanclik
Re: The title Attribute (Was: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.6. The root element Robert Burns
Re: 3.6. The root element Anne van Kesteren
Re: 3.6. The root element Robert Burns
Re: lang and xml:lang Re: 3.4. Global attributes Anne van Kesteren
Re: lang and xml:lang Re: 3.4. Global attributes Jirka Kosek
Re: 3.6. The root element Anne van Kesteren
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Jason White
Re: 3.4. Global attributes Anne van Kesteren
Downloading of images by UA Jason White
Re: lang and xml:lang Re: 3.4. Global attributes Anne van Kesteren
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Smylers
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Charles McCathieNevile
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Joshue O Connor
Re: The title Attribute (Was: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Smylers
Re: authoring @lang (was 3.6. The root element) Jason White
Re: authoring @lang (was 3.6. The root element) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: authoring @lang (was 3.6. The root element) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Jason White
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Henri Sivonen
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Karl Dubost
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? L. David Baron
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Bruce Lawson
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content Lachlan Hunt
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Jason White
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Robert Burns
Patterns for explicit associations Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Karl Dubost
Re: authoring @lang (was 3.6. The root element) Karl Dubost
Re: addition or subtrraction? [was Re: dropping longdesc attribute] Jason White
Re: authoring @lang (was 3.6. The root element) Robert Burns
lang and xml:lang Re: 3.4. Global attributes Karl Dubost
Re: authoring @lang (was 3.6. The root element) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? L. David Baron
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Karl Dubost
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.4. Global attributes Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Philip Taylor
Re: Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: CR and LF in the input stream / as NCRs (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Michael A. Puls II
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Jon Barnett
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Karl Dubost
CR and LF in the input stream / as NCRs (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Simon Pieters
RE: Formal Recorded Complaint John Foliot
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Doug Schepers

Monday, 30 July 2007

html5 nitpicks Jim Jewett
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Robert Burns
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Robert Burns
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Sam Ruby
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Maciej Stachowiak
Being respectful in HTML WG Karl Dubost
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Joshue O Connor
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Maciej Stachowiak
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Robert Burns
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Doug Schepers
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Tina Holmboe
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element James Graham
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Sam Ruby
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Maciej Stachowiak
RE: Formal Recorded Complaint John Foliot
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Laura Carlson
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Sam Ruby
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Dan Connolly
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Robert Burns
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Sam Ruby
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Robert Burns
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Cindy Sue Causey
Re: 3.6. The root element Robert Burns
3.14.x Medias Marcin Hanclik
Re: Formal Recorded Complaint Dan Connolly
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Maurice Carey
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Joshue O Connor
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Lachlan Hunt
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Smylers
Element-specific attributes Ben Boyle
3.7. Document metadata Ben Boyle
Re: <table chart="pie"> Maurice Carey
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Maurice Carey
Re: 3.6. The root element Ben Boyle
Re: 3.6. The root element James Graham
Re: 3.6. The root element Henri Sivonen
Re: 3.6. The root element Anne van Kesteren
Re: 3.6. The root element Ben Boyle
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
Re: 3.6. The root element Lachlan Hunt
Re: 3.6. The root element Anne van Kesteren
3.6. The root element Ben Boyle
Re: 3.4. Global attributes Anne van Kesteren
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Joshue O Connor
3.4. Global attributes Ben Boyle
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Laura Carlson
Re: 3.2. Common microsyntaxes Anne van Kesteren
Re: 3.2. Common microsyntaxes Ben Boyle
<figure><object> content model (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: <table chart="pie"> Daniel Glazman
Marking up links to alternative versions of content (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Henri Sivonen
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Smylers
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Smylers
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Henri Sivonen
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Lachlan Hunt
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Karl Dubost
Re: <table chart="pie"> Karl Dubost
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Robert Burns
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Jon Barnett
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Karl Dubost
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Jon Barnett
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Jason White
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Lachlan Hunt
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Karl Dubost
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg

Sunday, 29 July 2007

Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Karl Dubost
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Joshue O Connor
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element James Graham
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Patrick H. Lauke
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? David Poehlman
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Karl Dubost
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Lee Kowalkowski
Re: ToolTips: bug or feature? David Poehlman
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Lachlan Hunt
Re: 3.1. Introduction (Semantics and structure of HTML elements) Henri Sivonen
Re: Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Shawn Medero
Use Cases for The <canvas> Element Lachlan Hunt
RE: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Al Gilman
ToolTips: bug or feature? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: 3.2. Common microsyntaxes Simon Pieters
Re: Title and Alt Attributes (was: Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests?) Lachlan Hunt
3.3. Documents and document fragments Ben Boyle
3.2. Common microsyntaxes Ben Boyle
3.1. Introduction (Semantics and structure of HTML elements) Ben Boyle
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
RE: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? John Foliot
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Jason White
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Jason White
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Ben Boyle

Saturday, 28 July 2007

Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Joshue O Connor
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Tokeniser meta-implementation Philip Taylor
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Anne van Kesteren
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Ben Boyle
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Ben Boyle
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Anne van Kesteren
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Anne van Kesteren
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Jason White
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Patrick H. Lauke
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Patrick H. Lauke
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Lachlan Hunt
Re: <table chart="pie"> Matthew Raymond
Re: <object data type> when type is unsupported (detailed review of Semantics) Michael A. Puls II
Re: <table chart="pie"> Patrick H. Lauke

Friday, 27 July 2007

Re: Comments on IRC log Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: <object data type> when type is unsupported (detailed review of Semantics) Sander Tekelenburg

Thursday, 26 July 2007

Comments on IRC log Joshue O Connor

Friday, 27 July 2007

<object data type> when type is unsupported (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Al Gilman
conflation of issues or convergence of interests? Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Comments on IRC log James Graham
Re: <input type="rgb" value="110 120 130"> Thomas Broyer
Re: <input type="percent" value="40"> Thomas Broyer
<input type="rgb" value="110 120 130"> Dmitry Turin
<table chart="pie"> Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages> Dmitry Turin
popularization of Unicode (was: Re[4]: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG)) Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool Dmitry Turin
<input type="percent" value="40"> Dmitry Turin
Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Dmitry Turin
Re [3]: auto-submit form TABLE Dmitry Turin
Re: User Testing elements of HTML 5 spec Joshue O Connor
Re: Comments on IRC log Joshue O Connor
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: Comments on IRC log Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types (was Comments on IRC log) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Lachlan Hunt
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types (was Comments on IRC log) Jon Barnett
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types (was Comments on IRC log) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Comments on IRC log James Graham

Thursday, 26 July 2007

Re: Comments on IRC log Lachlan Hunt
Detailed review of Section 1. Introduction. Lee Kowalkowski
Re: (phrase extensions and bidirectional text orverride <span> and <bdo>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Robert Burns
Re: (marks, definitions, terms, abbreviations, and variables <m>, <dfn>, <abbr>, <term>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Robert Burns
Re: Comments on IRC log Cindy Sue Causey
Formal Recorded Complaint John Foliot
Re: (phrase extensions and bidirectional text orverride <span> and <bdo>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Smylers
Re: (marks, definitions, terms, abbreviations, and variables <m>, <dfn>, <abbr>, <term>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Smylers
Comments on IRC log Joshue O Connor
Re: "Canonical" HTML5 and XHTML5 output Robert Burns
Re: tabindex=bogus (detailed review of Semantics) Thomas Broyer
Re: tabindex=bogus (detailed review of Semantics) Shawn Medero
Re: tabindex=bogus (detailed review of Semantics) Jon Barnett
tabindex=bogus (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Editorial: event handler attributes Anne van Kesteren
Re: "Canonical" HTML5 and XHTML5 output Thomas Broyer
Re: "Canonical" HTML5 and XHTML5 output Cecil Ward

Wednesday, 25 July 2007

Are Web Applications Still a Vague Subject ? whatwg@appxweb.com
Re: [Whatwg] Are Web Applications Still a Vague Subject ? liorean
" in data when getting .innerHTML (detailed review of Serialising HTML fragments) Simon Pieters
<p><table> parsing (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Simon Pieters
Re: document.title (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
"The html element" (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: "Canonical" HTML5 and XHTML5 output Anne van Kesteren

Tuesday, 24 July 2007

Re: "Canonical" HTML5 and XHTML5 output Jon Barnett
Re: "Canonical" HTML5 and XHTML5 output Robert Burns
Re: [html5] Multiple IDs for an element? Robert Burns
Re: [html5] Multiple IDs for an element? Jens Meiert
Re: [html5] Multiple IDs for an element? Anne van Kesteren
[html5] Multiple IDs for an element? Jens Meiert
"Canonical" HTML5 and XHTML5 output Cecil Ward
Microformats and cowpaths Robert Burns
Re: Ambiguous ampersands (detailed review of Writing HTML documents) Simon Pieters
Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Ben Boyle
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Simon Pieters
Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Sander Tekelenburg
Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg

Monday, 23 July 2007

Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Alexey Proskuryakov
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Simon Pieters
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Anne van Kesteren
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [html5] "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" feedback Anne van Kesteren
Stray less-than signs (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Simon Pieters
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Ambiguous ampersands (detailed review of Writing HTML documents) Simon Pieters
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Jon Barnett
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Patrick H. Lauke
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Simon Pieters
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Jon Barnett
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Simon Pieters
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
(marks, definitions, terms, abbreviations, and variables <m>, <dfn>, <abbr>, <term>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Jon Barnett
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Jon Barnett
Re: [html5] "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" feedback Jens Meiert
Re: administrative: search letters via e-mail Julian Reschke
Re: <meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool Julian Reschke

Friday, 20 July 2007

Re: administrative: search letters via e-mail Dmitry Turin
<meta name=register>, Browser as passive tool (was: Presentation by XML) Dmitry Turin
Re: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG) Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG) Dmitry Turin

Sunday, 22 July 2007

Seeing the HTML5 parse tree (was: Re: handling fallback content for still images) Henri Sivonen
Re: [html5] "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" feedback Anne van Kesteren
(Time, Meter, Progress, DATA <time>, <meter>, <progress>, <data>, etc.) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Lachlan Hunt

Saturday, 21 July 2007

Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Robert Burns
Re: (code, sample output and keyboard/device input <code>, <samp>, <kybd>) part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements Andrew Sidwell
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Michael A. Puls II
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Thomas Broyer

Friday, 20 July 2007

Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Terry Morris

Saturday, 21 July 2007

Friday, 20 July 2007

Thursday, 19 July 2007

Re: Opening thoughts on WAI-ARIA in HTML5 Robert Burns
Re: part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (importance <strong> element) Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Thomas Broyer
Re: part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (quotations <q> and <quote>)(and <blockquote> and HTMLQuoteElement) Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Henri Sivonen
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Maurice Carey
Re: Opening thoughts on WAI-ARIA in HTML5 Joshue O Connor
reframe contentious 'principles' Al Gilman
minutes: HTML WG teleconference 19 July (for review) Dan Connolly
any issues with "The XMLHttpRequest Object" 18 June draft? Dan Connolly
Re: part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (quotations <q> and <quote>)(and <blockquote> and HTMLQuoteElement) Olivier GENDRIN
Re: part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (importance <strong> element) Smylers
Re: part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (<small> small element) Robert Burns
part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (importance <strong> element) Robert Burns
part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (<em> emphasis element) Robert Burns
part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (citations <cite> element) Robert Burns
part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (quotations <q> and <quote>)(and <blockquote> and HTMLQuoteElement) Robert Burns
part of my review of 3.12 Phrase elements (<a> anchor element) Robert Burns
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Lachlan Hunt
Re: <pages> <page>...<page> </pages> Ben Boyle
Re[2]: auto-submit form TABLE Dmitry Turin
administrative: search letters via e-mail Dmitry Turin
Presentation by XML Dmitry Turin
Re: Opening thoughts on WAI-ARIA in HTML5 Henri Sivonen
UA wiki page Robert Burns
Re: default role values for HTML elements and built-in accessibility Robert Burns
default role values for HTML elements and built-in accessibility Robert Burns
Re: extracting semantics Re: Namespace Karl Dubost

Wednesday, 18 July 2007

Opening thoughts on WAI-ARIA in HTML5 Al Gilman
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Thomas Broyer
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types w3c@appxweb.com
agenda: HTML WG teleconference 19 July Dan Connolly
Re: minutes: HTML WG 12 July for review Dan Connolly
minutes: HTML WG 12 July for review Dan Connolly
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: extracting semantics Re: Namespace Laura Carlson
Structuralism or non-presentationalism principle (was: Re: extracting semantics) Henri Sivonen
Re: HTMLImageElement.width / height (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re[4]: unite two space: attributes and properties Dmitry Turin
<pages> <page>...<page> </pages> Dmitry Turin
Re: auto-submit form TABLE Dmitry Turin
Re[3]: unite two space: attributes and properties Dmitry Turin
<sub> and control symbol (was Re: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG)) Dmitry Turin
Re: Two ways of development Dmitry Turin
Re: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG) Dmitry Turin
Re: extracting semantics Re: Namespace Ben Boyle
HTMLTableCellElement.colSpan and rowSpan (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: extracting semantics Re: Namespace James Graham
Re: extracting semantics Re: Namespace Robert Burns
Re: extracting semantics Re: Namespace Henri Sivonen
Re: extracting semantics Re: Namespace Ben Boyle
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Henri Sivonen
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Robert Burns
Re: Namespace Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Lachlan Hunt
Re: Namespace Lachlan Hunt
Character encoding errors (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: extracting semantics Re: Namespace James Graham
Re: Namespace Andrew Sidwell
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Lachlan Hunt
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Henri Sivonen
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Thomas Broyer
Re: Small print is not a good idea Re: Namespace Karl Dubost
Re: Small print is not a good idea Re: Namespace Maciej Stachowiak
Re: extracting semantics Re: Namespace Lachlan Hunt
Re: Namespace Robert Burns
Re: Namespace Robert Burns
Re: Subdocument fragments in a compound document (part of detailed review of documents and document framegents) Robert Burns
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Karl Dubost
Small print is not a good idea Re: Namespace Charles McCathieNevile
extracting semantics Re: Namespace Karl Dubost
Re: Namespace Lachlan Hunt
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Robert Burns
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Namespace Robert Burns

Tuesday, 17 July 2007

Re: Researching HTML usage in existing content Philip Taylor
Re: Namespace Robert Burns
Re: Namespace Lachlan Hunt
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Thomas Broyer
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review James Graham
Re: Why legend has been preferred to caption for figures (was: 3.15 Tabular Data Review) Robert Burns
Why legend has been preferred to caption for figures (was: 3.15 Tabular Data Review) Thomas Broyer
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Robert Burns
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review Robert Burns
Re: boolean attributes case-sensitivity (detailed review of Semantics) Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Thomas Broyer
boolean attributes case-sensitivity (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
RFC 2396 v. RFC 3986 v. RFC 3987 (general comment, part of detailed review of spec) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review Laura Carlson
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
accessibility exercise and design principles (Re: unifying alternate content...) Laura Carlson
accessibility exercise and design principles (Re: unifying alternate content...) Laura Carlson
accessibility exercise and design principles (Re: unifying alternate content...) Laura Carlson
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Robert Burns
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Robert Burns
Re: Namespace Robert Burns
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Simon Pieters
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments James Graham
Re: 3.11 Lists Review Comments (ol/@start, li/@value) Dan Connolly
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Subdocument fragments in a compound document (part of detailed review of documents and document framegents) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: DOMTokenList.add() when the underlying string is empty (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Henri Sivonen
DOMTokenList.add() when the underlying string is empty (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Ben Boyle
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Philip Taylor
Why HTML should be taught as HTML without pretending it is XML Henri Sivonen
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review Smylers
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Olivier GENDRIN
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Gervase Markham
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Namespace Maciej Stachowiak
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Robert Burns
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Maciej Stachowiak
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: Namespace Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Namespace Lachlan Hunt
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Robert Burns
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Philip Taylor
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft), review of Robert Burns

Monday, 16 July 2007

Re: @ping attribute wiki page. Jon Barnett
3.11 Lists Review Comments Debi Orton
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft) Henri Sivonen
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review Laura Carlson
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft) Laura Carlson
Re: @ping attribute wiki page. Maurice Carey
Re: the style attribute Maurice Carey
Reflecting attributes: HTMLElement (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft) Andrew Sidwell
Re: Reflecting attributes: float, DOMTimeStamp (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: Validity & Must Not/Should Not/May Not Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Reflecting attributes: boolean (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Reflecting attributes: float, DOMTimeStamp (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Two ways of development Dmitry Turin
auto-submit form TABLE Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: unite two space: attributes and properties Dmitry Turin
Re: 3.15 Tabular Data Review Simon Pieters
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft) Olivier GENDRIN
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft) Olivier GENDRIN
Entities in RCDATA with escape flag (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: Namespace Robert Burns
Re: Detecting support for a given HTML5 feature through JS Henri Sivonen
Re: [whatwg] Web forms 2, input type suggestions Thomas Broyer
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
3.11 Lists Review Comments Debi Orton
3.15 Tabular Data Review Debi Orton
Re: Dates in HTML 5 Jonas Sicking
Re: Detecting support for a given HTML5 feature through JS Doug Schepers
Re: Detecting support for a given HTML5 feature through JS Maciej Stachowiak
3.11 Lists Review Comments Debi Orton
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Andrew Sidwell
Re: Compatibility with XHTML2 Lachlan Hunt
Re: Compatibility with XHTML2 Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: Compatibility with XHTML2 Maciej Stachowiak

Sunday, 15 July 2007

Re: Validity & Must Not/Should Not/May Not Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: Validity & Must Not/Should Not/May Not Andrew Sidwell
Namespace Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Smylers
Re: Compatibility with XHTML2 Robert Burns
Re: Validity & Must Not/Should Not/May Not Robert Burns
Re: Detecting support for a given HTML5 feature through JS Doug Schepers
Compatibility with XHTML2 Smylers
Re: Validity & Must Not/Should Not/May Not Smylers
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: Validity & Must Not/Should Not/May Not Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Smylers
HTMLImageElement.width / height (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: handling fallback content for still images Smylers
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Robert Burns
Researching HTML usage in existing content (was: Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types) Henri Sivonen
Validity & Must Not/Should Not/May Not Smylers
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Sander Tekelenburg
Detecting support for a given HTML5 feature through JS (was: Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script) Henri Sivonen
Re: 3.1 Introduction (Draft) Rimantas Liubertas
3.1 Introduction (Draft) Debi Orton
HTMLTableColElement.span being limited to only positive non-zero numbers (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Smylers
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Jon Barnett
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Smylers
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Smylers
<col> as child of <table> (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Smylers
Re: Using XSLT to output the HTML 5 DOCTYPE Joe D'Andrea
Re: @ping attribute wiki page. Smylers
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Jon Barnett
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Jon Barnett
HoTMetaL doctypes should trigger quirks mode (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Simon Pieters
Re: <li value=bogus> (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: <li value=bogus> (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Andrew Sidwell
longdesc semantics and optional content Re: unifying alternate ... Charles McCathieNevile
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Ben Boyle
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Doug Schepers
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Charles McCathieNevile
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Patrick Garies
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Jon Barnett
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Jon Barnett

Saturday, 14 July 2007

Re: Please, check subjects... and maintain threading... Robert Burns
Re: [whatwg] Web forms 2, input type suggestions Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Please, check subjects... and maintain threading... Robert Burns
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Please, check subjects... Charles McCathieNevile
<li value=bogus> (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: equivalent content must not be an either/or proposition Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: stopping discussions on serializations and contributing constructively Robert Burns
Re: @ping attribute wiki page. Patrick H. Lauke
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns

Friday, 13 July 2007

Saturday, 14 July 2007

Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Andrew Sidwell
Re: in body "select" not associated with the form pointer (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: equivalent content must not be an either/or proposition Charles McCathieNevile
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Ben Boyle
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Ben Boyle
equivalent content must not be an either/or proposition Gregory J. Rosmaita

Friday, 13 July 2007

Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Re: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG) Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Doug Schepers
Re: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG) Robert Burns
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG) Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: Using XSLT to output the HTML 5 DOCTYPE Julian Reschke
Re: Using XSLT to output the HTML 5 DOCTYPE Sam Ruby
Using XSLT to output the HTML 5 DOCTYPE Jon Barnett
Enumerated attributes limited to only known values (detailed review of Semantics) Simon Pieters
Re: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: fallback for css-file Sander Tekelenburg
Re: fallback for css-file (was Re[2]: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images)) Jon Barnett
Re: unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Sander Tekelenburg
Two cases for end tag "br" in "in body" (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re[2]: alignment of <input>-s and their pseudo-elements (was: Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images)) Dmitry Turin
Re: HTML WG Dmitry Turin
fallback for css-file (was Re[2]: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images)) Dmitry Turin
Presentation by XML Dmitry Turin
[html5] "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" feedback Jens Meiert
[html5] "draggable" attribute renaming? Jens Meiert
Re: document.body (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
document.body (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters

Thursday, 12 July 2007

Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Thomas Broyer
minutes: HTML WG teleconference Thu 12 July (for review) Dan Connolly
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Arthur Jennings
Re: Accessibility Advice on HTML 5 Design Principles Katie Haritos-Shea
Implementation + Test Cases Available For Numbers Subsection of Common Microsyntaxes Geoffrey Sneddon
List Of Integers repeats itself (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Accessibility Advice on HTML 5 Design Principles Jon Gunderson
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Ben Boyle
Re: stopping discussions on serializations and contributing constructively Maurice Carey
Accessibility Advice on HTML 5 Design Principles Laura Carlson
Ratios is Stylistically Different To Other Number Algorithms (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: stopping discussions on serializations and contributing constructively Jon Barnett

Wednesday, 11 July 2007

stopping discussions on serializations and contributing constructively Robert Burns
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Smylers
Re: review of "The root element" subsection Robert Burns
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Ian Hickson
Lack Of Finished Check In Comma/Space State (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Should Lists Of Integers Allow Other Whitespace Characters? (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
More Odd Results From List Of Numbers (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
agenda: HTML WG teleconference Thu 12 July Dan Connolly
List Of Numbers Produces Incorrect Output (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Jon Barnett
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Dan Connolly
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Smylers
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Maurice Carey
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Jon Barnett
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Dan Connolly
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Smylers
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Maurice Carey
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Maurice Carey
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Maurice Carey
Re: Ratios Do Not Return Errors (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
alignment of <input>-s and their pseudo-elements (was: Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images)) Dmitry Turin
unite two space: attributes and properties Dmitry Turin
Re: unify ancient attributes Dmitry Turin
small consultation Dmitry Turin
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Dmitry Turin
<formdata sa= > Dmitry Turin
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Smylers
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Robert Burns
Re: Ratios Do Not Return Errors (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Smylers
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Smylers
[Ann] A limping development version of an HTML5 parser in Java Henri Sivonen
document.title (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Thomas Broyer
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Robert Burns
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: numerals for microformats Robert Burns
numerals for microformats Robert Burns
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Jon Barnett
Re: review of "The root element" subsection Robert Burns

Tuesday, 10 July 2007

Re: review of "The root element" subsection James Graham
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: review of "The root element" subsection (considering html/@charset) Robert Burns
Re: review of "The root element" subsection Robert Burns
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Doug Schepers
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Andrew Fedoniouk
Re: Foster parenting characters (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Foster parenting characters (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: review of "The root element" subsection (considering html/@charset) Dan Connolly
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Thomas Broyer
Re: HTML Extensibility Through Script Andrew Fedoniouk
Ratios algorithm continues beyond data (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
HTML Extensibility Through Script Doug Schepers
Re: Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Robert Burns
Ratios Do Not Return Errors (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Lack Of Definition Of A Valid Ratio (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: review of "The root element" subsection Simon Pieters
Re: [Parsing] When/how flagged as being HTML Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images James Graham
Re: review of "The root element" subsection Robert Burns
Re: review of "The root element" subsection Simon Pieters
Re: review of "The root element" subsection Robert Burns
RE: [Parsing] When/how flagged as being HTML DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT
insert vs. append (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: [Parsing] When/how flagged as being HTML Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Karl Dubost
[Parsing] When/how flagged as being HTML Karl Dubost

Monday, 9 July 2007

let's keep metadata profiles (head/@profile) in HTML for use in GRDDL etc. Dan Connolly
Re: handling fallback content for still images Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: edge issues with DOM, text/html, and xml serializations [was Re: handling fallback content for still images] Robert Burns
Re: edge issues with DOM, text/html, and xml serializations [was Re: handling fallback content for still images] Andrew Sidwell
Re: wiki aims for community voice/NPOV [was: review of "The root element" subsection] Dan Connolly
Re: wiki aims for community voice/NPOV [was: review of "The root element" subsection] Robert Burns
Re: Wiki Section for Draft Reviews Dan Connolly
Re: edge issues with DOM, text/html, and xml serializations [was Re: handling fallback content for still images] Robert Burns
Re: edge issues with DOM, text/html, and xml serializations [was Re: handling fallback content for still images] James Graham
wiki aims for community voice/NPOV [was: review of "The root element" subsection] Dan Connolly
type parameter of Document.open() (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: edge issues with DOM, text/html, and xml serializations [was Re: handling fallback content for still images] Jon Barnett
Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images scott lewis
Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Re: edge issues with DOM, text/html, and xml serializations [was Re: handling fallback content for still images] Thomas Broyer
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: edge issues with DOM, text/html, and xml serializations [was Re: handling fallback content for still images] Robert Burns
Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) liorean
Re: edge issues with DOM, text/html, and xml serializations [was Re: handling fallback content for still images] James Graham
Re: review of "The root element" subsection Andrew Sidwell
Re: handling fallback content for still images Maciej Stachowiak
Re: handling fallback content for still images Maciej Stachowiak
Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) Cameron McCormack
Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) Cameron McCormack
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) Maciej Stachowiak
Re: handling fallback content for still images Maciej Stachowiak
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
edge issues with DOM, text/html, and xml serializations [was Re: handling fallback content for still images] Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Maciej Stachowiak
HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) Simon Pieters
Wiki Section for Draft Reviews Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images James Graham
Re: review of "The root element" subsection Robert Burns
RE: DI element DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
review of "The root element" subsection Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images James Graham
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Thomas Broyer
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Thomas Broyer
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Maciej Stachowiak
Re: object element interoperability Re: handling fallback content for still images Karl Dubost
Re: On the color of the bikeshed, belling the cat, opportunity cost and marginalism Karl Dubost
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images scott lewis
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Karl Dubost
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Karl Dubost
Re: Detailed review of section "Namespaces" Karl Dubost
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images scott lewis
Re: handling fallback content for still images Jon Barnett
Re: handling fallback content for still images scott lewis

Sunday, 8 July 2007

Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Thomas Broyer
On the color of the bikeshed, belling the cat, opportunity cost and marginalism Henri Sivonen
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Ben Boyle
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Henri Sivonen
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: DI element Charles McCathieNevile
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3 Working Draft? formal decision Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Implementing Accesskey - some techniques Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Ben Boyle
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Ben Boyle

Saturday, 7 July 2007

Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Michael A. Puls II
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Maciej Stachowiak
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Robert Burns
Editorial Issues 1 (part of detailed review of common microsyntaxes) Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Robert Burns
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Michael A. Puls II
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Michael A. Puls II
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Philip TAYLOR
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Philip TAYLOR
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Michael A. Puls II
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Philip TAYLOR
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Philip TAYLOR
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Ben Boyle
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Robert Burns
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Mynthon Gmail
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Ben Boyle
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Jon Barnett

Friday, 6 July 2007

Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images scott lewis
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Sander Tekelenburg
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Philip TAYLOR
unifying alternate content across embedded content element types Robert Burns
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... scott lewis
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Thomas Broyer
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Jon Barnett
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Philip TAYLOR
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Philip TAYLOR
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Anne van Kesteren
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Jon Barnett
If in one sentence qualifying another sentence when resetting the insertion mode (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Dan Connolly
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Philip TAYLOR
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. gonchuki
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Sander Tekelenburg
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Michael A. Puls II
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Dan Connolly
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. gonchuki
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Smylers
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Joshue O Connor
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Dan Connolly
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Dan Connolly
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: {off topic} [was:[W3C docs] We should teach by example.] Michael(tm) Smith
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Smylers
Re: {off topic} [was:[W3C docs] We should teach by example.] Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: {off topic} [was:[W3C docs] We should teach by example.] Dan Connolly
Re: html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Thomas Broyer
html5 syntax - why not use xml syntax? Mynthon
{off topic} [was:[W3C docs] We should teach by example.] Michael(tm) Smith
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: <code type="..."> Josh Sled
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Josh Sled
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
<legend> = <caption> Dmitry Turin

Thursday, 5 July 2007

Re: unify ancient tags, Re: handling fallback content for still images Dmitry Turin

Thursday, 28 June 2007

Re[2]: <code type="..."> Dmitry Turin

Friday, 6 July 2007

Re: Table-related element on the implied end tag list (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: Generating implied end tags upon </table> "in table" (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Laura Carlson
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Ben Boyle
Re: handling fallback content for still images Joshue O Connor
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Joshue O Connor
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Peter Krantz
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Joshue O Connor
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Joshue O Connor
Re: Proposal: accessibility revision for the img element... Joshue O Connor
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Generating implied end tags upon </table> "in table" (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Joshue O Connor
Detailed review of section "Namespaces" Henri Sivonen
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened [was Re: fear of "invisible metadata"] Joshue O Connor
Re: [W3C docs] We should teach by example. Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo
"table" in table scope (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: can an img be a link within figure? Henri Sivonen
[W3C docs] We should teach by example. gonchuki
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: can an img be a link within figure? Lachlan Hunt

Thursday, 5 July 2007

Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images scott lewis
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Thomas Broyer
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images scott lewis
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Robert Burns
notice of HTML WG teleconference Thu 12 July 1700Z Dan Connolly
Re: can an img be a link within figure? Thomas Broyer
Re: Some data about the usage of style="", <style> and <link rel="stylesheet"> Rene Saarsoo
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Laura Carlson
Re: Some data about the usage of style="", <style> and <link rel="stylesheet"> Dan Connolly
Some data about the usage of style="", <style> and <link rel="stylesheet"> Rene Saarsoo
Re: can an img be a link within figure? Bruce Lawson
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Rene Saarsoo
Re: Improving alt (was handling fallback content for still images) Sander Tekelenburg
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Laura Carlson
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Jon Barnett
Re: handling fallback content for still images Smylers
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Laura Carlson
Re: handling fallback content for still images Anne van Kesteren
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Dan Connolly
Re: handling fallback content for still images Fabien Basmaison
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Dan Connolly
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Jon Barnett
Re: handling fallback content for still images Jon Barnett
Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Laura Carlson
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Dan Connolly
Re: handling fallback content for still images Smylers
Re: handling fallback content for still images Andrew Sidwell
care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...] Dan Connolly
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: handling fallback content for still images Smylers
Re: handling fallback content for still images Ben Boyle
Re: SURVEY: Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft? formal decision Dan Connolly
Re: object element interoperability Re: handling fallback content for still images Ben Boyle
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: unify ancient attributes Ben Boyle
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Jon Barnett
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images James Graham
Re: handling fallback content for still images Ben Boyle
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
RE: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT
Re: handling fallback content for still images James Graham
Re: handling fallback content for still images Fabien Basmaison
Re: handling fallback content for still images Fabien Basmaison
Re: Off topic: form elements Fabien Basmaison
@ping attribute wiki page. Jon Barnett
Re: unify ancient attributes Maurice Carey
Re: handling fallback content for still images Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: can an img be a link within figure? Thomas Broyer
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
can an img be a link within figure? Ben Boyle
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Anne van Kesteren
Re: handling fallback content for still images Anne van Kesteren
Re: handling fallback content for still images Anne van Kesteren
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images James Graham
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Anne van Kesteren
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Non-sensical catch-all handling of end tags in "in body" (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Anne van Kesteren
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Anne van Kesteren
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Thomas Broyer
Useless implied end tags upon </p> (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: Scope, implied end tags, another scope check (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: unify ancient attributes Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Table-related element on the implied end tag list (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: Scope, implied end tags, another scope check (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Ian Hickson
Just popping when generating implied end tags (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Thomas Broyer
Re: Scope, implied end tags, another scope check (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen

Thursday, 28 June 2007

unify ancient attributes Dmitry Turin
unify ancient tags Dmitry Turin
unify WF2 and XF Dmitry Turin
Re[2]: #:body.h2[5] Dmitry Turin
Poll about <line> Dmitry Turin

Thursday, 5 July 2007

Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Scope, implied end tags, another scope check (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Jon Barnett
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Robert Burns

Wednesday, 4 July 2007

Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Patrick H. Lauke
Popping until no element with the token name in scope (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: What happens if ... we drop @style (was: Re: Wiki page for style attribute) Robert Burns
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Galen O'Hanlon
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Off topic: form elements Benjamin Chait
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Michael(tm) Smith
Off topic: form elements Maurice Carey
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Michael(tm) Smith
Re: What happens if ... we drop @style Jens Meiert
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Michael(tm) Smith
Re: What happens if ... we drop @style James Graham
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Sander Tekelenburg
What happens if ... we drop @style (was: Re: Wiki page for style attribute) Jens Meiert
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Sander Tekelenburg
Re: accessibility of video element Dave Singer
Re: accessibility of video element Dave Singer
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Sander Tekelenburg
Re: handling fallback content for still images Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Accesskey - Whats it for? Joshue O Connor
Re: accessibility of video element aurelien levy
Re: DI element Rob Marshall
Re: handling fallback content for still images Sander Tekelenburg
Re: accessibility of video element Charles McCathieNevile
Gathering Rationales (Wiki page) Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: More on <CAPTION> element etc Dão Gottwald
Inserting frameset (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Ben Boyle
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Anne van Kesteren
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Charles McCathieNevile
Re: DI element Anne van Kesteren
Re: CSS syntax inside scoped style, was: Wiki page for style attribute Eric Daspet
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Karl Dubost
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Nathan Youngman
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Michael A. Puls II
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Karl Dubost
object element interoperability Re: handling fallback content for still images Karl Dubost
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Karl Dubost
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Karl Dubost
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Patrick Garies

Tuesday, 3 July 2007

Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Patrick H. Lauke
Re: handling fallback content for still images Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" James Graham
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Robert Burns
Re: DI element Andrew Ramsden
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Thomas Broyer
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Andrew Ramsden
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Andrew Ramsden
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Ian Hickson
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Thomas Broyer
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Robert Burns
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Robert Burns
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Robert Burns
Re: DI element aurélien levy
Re: Wiki page for style attribute gonchuki
Re: DI element Ian Hickson
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" James Graham
Re: Proposal for a new element instead of <style scoped> Thomas Broyer
Re: DI element Rob Marshall
Proposal for a new element instead of <style scoped> Rene Saarsoo
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: CSS syntax inside scoped style, was: Wiki page for style attribute L. David Baron
Re: CSS syntax inside scoped style, was: Wiki page for style attribute Thomas Broyer
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Laura Carlson
CSS syntax inside scoped style, was: Wiki page for style attribute Rene Saarsoo
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Laura Carlson
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Martin Atkins
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: [html] HTML elements index Jens Meiert
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Rene Saarsoo
Re: [html] HTML elements index Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Wiki page for style attribute scott lewis
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Eric Daspet
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Maurice Carey
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Edward O'Connor
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] aurelien levy
Implementing Accesskey - some techniques Charles McCathieNevile
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Thomas Broyer
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Andrew Ramsden
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
Re: handling fallback content for still images Philip Taylor (Webmaster)
RE: Define: Fall Back DESCHAMPS Stephane ROSI/SI CLIENT
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Thomas Broyer
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Ben Boyle
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Laura Carlson
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Henri Sivonen
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Ben Boyle
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Michael(tm) Smith
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Michael(tm) Smith
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Henri Sivonen
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Michael(tm) Smith
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Thomas Broyer
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Ben Boyle
Re: Accesskey - spec proposal Maciej Stachowiak
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" James Graham
Re: handling fallback content for still images Sander Tekelenburg
Accesskey - spec proposal Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Anne van Kesteren
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Sander Tekelenburg
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Anne van Kesteren
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Henri Sivonen
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Anne van Kesteren
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Anne van Kesteren
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Dão Gottwald
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Sander Tekelenburg
Re: accessibility of video element Dave Singer
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Philip TAYLOR
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Henri Sivonen
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Henri Sivonen
Update: Naming Issue, Proposals Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
Re: handling fallback content for still images Henri Sivonen
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Maciej Stachowiak
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Ian Hickson
Re: handling fallback content for still images Maciej Stachowiak
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Sander Tekelenburg
Re: handling fallback content for still images Sander Tekelenburg
Re: handling fallback content for still images Ian Hickson
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Ian Hickson
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Ian Hickson

Monday, 2 July 2007

Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Cameron McCormack
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Maurice Carey
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Maurice Carey
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Maurice Carey
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Dan Connolly
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Dan Connolly
accessibility of video element aurélien levy
translation task added to survey (was: HTML5 differences ...) Dan Connolly
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Joshue O Connor
Re: handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Robert Burns
Re: <code type="..."> Dão Gottwald
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki James Graham
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Maciej Stachowiak
Re: <code type="..."> Thomas Broyer
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Maciej Stachowiak
Re: <code type="..."> Daniel E. Renfer
Definitions, Clarifications & Request for Consensus on Terminology on Wiki [was Re: Define: Fall Back] Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Define: Fall Back Joshue O Connor
Re: handling fallback content for still images Maciej Stachowiak
in body "select" not associated with the form pointer (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Maciej Stachowiak
Re: Define: Fall Back Gregory J. Rosmaita
Re: Definition items as nested DL elements (was Re: DI element) Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Smylers
Re: "placeholder link" Dão Gottwald
Re: HTML5 differences from HTML4 editor's draft Dão Gottwald

Sunday, 1 July 2007

Re: Note on terminology: Attribute types Dão Gottwald
Re: <code type="..."> Dão Gottwald
Re: What is a "state"? Dão Gottwald

Monday, 2 July 2007

Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals Dão Gottwald
Definition items as nested DL elements (was Re: DI element) Thomas Broyer
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Sam Ruby
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Dannii
Reminder: " Release "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" as a W3C Working Draft?" survey closes 2007-07-03. Laura Carlson
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Ben Boyle
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Ben Boyle
Re: Drag and drop Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Joshue O Connor
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Joshue O Connor
Re: DI element Andrew Sidwell
Drag and drop Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Charles McCathieNevile
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurelien levy
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Joshue O Connor
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Joshue O Connor
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Joshue O Connor
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Joshue O Connor
Re: Define: Fall Back Joshue O Connor
Re: Idea for new element to support automatic rendering of descriptive content for people with disabilities Joshue O Connor
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Anne van Kesteren
Re: DI element Charles McCathieNevile
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: Define: Fall Back Anne van Kesteren
Define: Fall Back Joshue O Connor
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Andrew Ramsden
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Joshue O Connor
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Anne van Kesteren
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: handling fallback content for still images Anne van Kesteren
Re: DI element Martin Atkins
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Karl Dubost
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Karl Dubost
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Karl Dubost
Re: Un-subscribe from public-html without leaving HTMLWG? Karl Dubost
Re: [html] HTML elements index Karl Dubost

Sunday, 1 July 2007

Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Andrew Sidwell
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Sam Ruby
Re: DI element Ian Hickson
Re: DI element Rene Saarsoo
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Robert Burns
Re: DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Thomas Broyer
handling fallback content for still images Robert Burns
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Robert Burns
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Henri Sivonen
Re: the market hasn't spoken - it hasn't bothered to listened Patrick H. Lauke
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Robert Burns
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Henri Sivonen
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Robert Burns
in body "address" (etc.) and hn starts (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Robert Burns
Motivation of the generic [R]CDATA parsing algorithm (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
Moving <title> to head not clear "in body" (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
HTML5 3.7, 3.14.12-14, 8.2 Marco Neumann
base, link and meta are never popped (detailed review of parsing algorithm) Henri Sivonen
Neutrality in "HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Ben 'Cerbera' Millard
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
DI element [Re: html 5 and accessibility issue] Andrew Ramsden
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Andrew Ramsden
Re: Why the style attribute shouldn't be abandoned Henri Sivonen
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Laura Carlson
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki scott lewis
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content James Graham
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Anne van Kesteren
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Anne van Kesteren
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content scott lewis
Associating dt with prior dd (was: html 5 and accessibility issue) scott lewis
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Philip TAYLOR
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Geoffrey Sneddon
Re: Wiki page for style attribute Rene Saarsoo
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Thomas Broyer
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Philip TAYLOR
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Steven Faulkner
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Steven Faulkner
[html] HTML elements index (update) Jens Meiert
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Simon Pieters
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - dl element Anne van Kesteren
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Anne van Kesteren
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Anne van Kesteren
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Philip TAYLOR
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Roger Johansson
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Philip TAYLOR
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content Lachlan Hunt
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue aurélien levy
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
Re: some thoughts on objections to publishing ""HTML 5 differences from HTML 4" Lachlan Hunt
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue - need of fallback content aurélien levy
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Philip TAYLOR
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Anne van Kesteren
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Philip TAYLOR
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Philip TAYLOR
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Ben Boyle
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Peter Krantz
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Sander Tekelenburg
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Robert Burns
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Lachlan Hunt
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Bill Mason
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Sander Tekelenburg
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
Re: html 5 and accessibility issue Dannii
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Lachlan Hunt
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Sander Tekelenburg
Re: LONGDESC: some current problems and a proposed solution added to the wiki Robert Burns

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 July 2007 23:58:44 UTC