- From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:18:47 -0500
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Let me add one more to this list (for html <iframe> type use): <object data='myhtml'> fallback </object> On Jul 2, 2007, at 10:27 PM, Robert Burns wrote: > On Jul 2, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Sander Tekelenburg wrote: >> I remember Chris Wilson saying he will not fix IE bugs if it >> affects an >> unspecified number of users. Basically that means that until IE >> disappears, a >> new element like <picture> is *way* more realistic than pretending >> that >> <object> will ever be interoperable. > > To be fair, I can't imagine how it would break any HTML in the wild > if IE and every other browser made these simplest forms of object > just work with reasonable default parameters : > <object data='myimage'> fallback </object> <object data='myvideo'> fallback </object> <object data='myaudio'> fallback </object> <object title="my way cool 2d animated drawing" type='image/canvas'> fallback </object> (obviously only for browsers that already support the canvas API or have suitable plugin to draw on) <object data=myflash'> fallback </object> > Am I just being too naive? > > Take care, > Rob >
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 04:19:01 UTC