- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:00:11 +0100
- To: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On 3 Jul 2007, at 08:32, Robert Burns wrote: > Again, this should be something fairly trivial to summarize for > long-time participants in the process (for strong memorable > rationales). It would be extremely cumbersome and perhaps even > futile for those of us who did not participate in the original > WhatWG to read through this lengthy record. Even if we summarise the reasons, we'll undoubtedly be asked why we came to such a conclusion, in which case the mailing lists will need to be read. As people read over the prior discussion, they can, as current discussions can (and probably should) be put on the wiki. - Geoffrey Sneddon
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 17:00:18 UTC