- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 06:00:16 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
At 22:01 -0500 UTC, on 2007-07-26, Jon Barnett wrote: [...] > What would be better about <picture>? (I though I just explained that? :)) > Today's MSIE halfway supports > <object>, but may fully support <object> in the future. What reason do you have to expect that <object> will ever be fixed in IE? [...] > The only problem with <object> in IE today is that it doesn't > fall back properly. And that it throws in gratuitous scrollbars. > I'm sure that can be fixed faster than asking for > support for a whole new element. Sure it /can/. I just don't see any reason to expect that it will. Mind you, I think all talk of <object> and <picture> is useless while Chris Wilson doesn't participate. I only meant to explain to Lachlan the point of <picture>. -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Friday, 27 July 2007 04:05:49 UTC