- From: Andrew Sidwell <takkaria@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:21:31 +0100
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > The suggestion made by someone that a singleton dt is "stupid" is > incorrect. There are a number of cases where a term might be listed > without a definition. AFAICS, no-one's actually given any use cases for having <dt> without <dd> on this thread so far, and I can't think of any offhand. Care to elaborate? -- Andrew Sidwell
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 10:21:22 UTC