- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:30:25 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:50:01 +0200, Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie> wrote: >> Basically does the term (in WG usage) refer content for elements that >> are not supported by the UA (in this case the browser) or is it content >> for people with disabilities using assistive technology? > > It depends. <video src=newsclip>fallback</video> is probably mostly for older browsers as you'd hope the video itself is accessible, but in case of <canvas>fallback</canvas> it is for both I think. Thanks Anne.
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 09:30:39 UTC