- From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 13:34:45 +0100
- To: "Roger Johansson" <roger@456bereastreet.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
>How realstic is it to expect people to provide alternate content for their >Flash content? an example "in the wild": image maps provided as alternate content for flash http://sites.target.com/site/en/corporate/page.jsp?contentId=PRD03-001811 On 01/07/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 11:55:26 +0200, Roger Johansson > <roger@456bereastreet.com> wrote: > >> Ideally, video would be made accessible by itself. > > > > Yes, but how realistic is that? > > How realstic is it to expect people to provide alternate content for their > Flash content? > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/> > > -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org -- with regards Steve Faulkner Technical Director - TPG Europe Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Received on Sunday, 1 July 2007 12:34:49 UTC