Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log)

for the record, the "AT vendors" dont even participate much in
the W3C's Access Initiative 


Sander Tekelenburg writes:
 > 
 > At 11:57 +0100 UTC, on 2007-07-27, James Graham wrote:
 > 
 > [...]
 > 
 > > I still find it quite disturbing that
 > > AFAIK, there are no AT implementors directly represented in the WG; it
 > >seems to
 > > me that they are failing their users by not taking an active role in the HTML
 > > development process.
 > 
 > Indeed.
 > 
 > I've suggested before that perhaps the chairs can actively approach those
 > parties to get them involved. I haven't seen a response to that. I don't know
 > if that means my suggestion went by unnoticed, was dimissed for whatever
 > reason, or is being acted upon? :)
 > 
 > 
 > -- 
 > Sander Tekelenburg
 > The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

Title:  Research Scientist      
Email:  raman@google.com
WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
Google: tv+raman 
GTalk:  raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc

Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 22:37:57 UTC