- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 20:41:24 +0200
- To: <public-html@w3.org>
At 09:19 +0100 UTC, on 2007-07-27, Joshue O Connor wrote: [...] > Maybe there is need for sub groups within the WG to look at various > issues (starting with the problem) and work from there. The groups could > take various issues that don't have to just be accessibility related, > get their heads together and come up with a focused solution to suggest > to the group. This would lead the process in an incremental manner > where ideas are thought out commented on and then abandoned or > progressed as needed. FWIW, I don't know if that would be a good idea. Sounds too much like the old "Ooh, this is getting difficult, let's form a commission" ;) In fact, the sub group will probably consist of mosty people with a particular interest. It's likely they'd do their work, and when presenting it will find that they didn't take other groups' interests into account enough. For instance, a sub group coming with an authoring solution for table accessibility may come up with something that puts an unrealistic burden on UAs. Similarly, UA implementors may come up with a feature that puts an unrealistic burden on authors, or cannot be made generally accessible. Both are happening now. We need to all work together to avoid such miscommunication. Just my 2 cents. [...] -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Friday, 27 July 2007 18:51:47 UTC