Re: care with empty/template wiki topics [was: some thoughts on ...]

On 7/5/07, Jon Barnett <jonbarnett@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/5/07, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/5/07, Jon Barnett <jonbarnett@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 7/5/07, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for following up, but let's not make empty/template pages.
> > > > > Would you please delete the ones with nothing novel in them?
> > > > > I'll try to help.
> > > >
> > > > Isn't this framework a useful start for us to begin to justify the
> > > > differences between HTML 4 and HTML 5?
> >
> > > It was to me earlier.
> >
> > Glad to hear it, Jon. It took me about a day to set them all up. Hate
> > to see them deleted if they are useful. It would be ashamed have to
> > remake them.
>
> Would it be better to go ahead and place links from
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML to some dummy pages, but clearly mark them as
> dummy pages?

That's a good idea. maybe flag them with something like  "needs content".

> It's useful to know what issues need wiki
> pages but don't have them, and what consistent format those wiki pages
> should be in.

Agreed.

Best Regards,
Laura

-- 
Laura L. Carlson
http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/webdesign/

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 17:43:48 UTC