Re: Lack of AT implementors participation (was Comments on IRC log)

Could one of the high-ups from w3c, or chair of this WG contact 
freedom scientific/ GW Micro etc directly and invite their participation ?

b

At 03:24 31/07/2007, Sander Tekelenburg wrote:

>At 22:12 -0500 UTC, on 2007-07-29, Robert Burns wrote:
>
>[...]
>
> > Quickly looking at the list I would say we have some of the few key
> > representative participating already. [...] we have Apple and Microsoft
> > represented: both making screen readers of varying abilities. [...]
> > In terms of aural browsing, Opera, IBM (Home Page Reader
> > (discontinued)) and Fire Vox are probably among the leaders: all
> > represented in our WG.
>
>Well, yeah, but it's obvious that we need to hear from *actual developers*
>why they thus far take the approaches they take, what they need from HTML5 to
>make their products better, and what they think of the current spec and what
>is being discussed/roposed concerning improving universality/accessibility in
>HTML5.
>
>
>--
>Sander Tekelenburg
>The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>

Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 07:00:11 UTC