- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 05:04:45 +0200
- To: <public-html@w3.org>
At 23:21 +0200 UTC, on 2007-06-30, Peter Krantz wrote: [...] > <picture src="ukflag.gif"> > <p>The UK flag consists of yada yada.... and:</p> > <ul> > <li>hackety hack</li> > </ul> > </picture> > > If I want to display the fallback content and the picture at the same > time Then the content isn't fallback content and shouldn't be marked up as such. The <picture> will then need other, *true fallback* content. Or the picture may be purely decorative and thus ought to have no fallback content. Btw, this made me realise that there seems to be a downside to <picture>: how could authors indicate that <picture src="meaninglessdecoration.gif"></picture> has no fallback content *on purpose*? Same applies to <object>, <video> and <audio>. -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Sunday, 1 July 2007 03:12:04 UTC