- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:27:26 -0700
- To: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: <public-html@w3.org>, "Sander Tekelenburg" <st@isoc.nl>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com> To: "Andrew Fedoniouk" <news@terrainformatica.com> Cc: <public-html@w3.org>; "Sander Tekelenburg" <st@isoc.nl> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1:22 PM Subject: Re: guessing character encoding (was HTML WG) > > > On Jul 13, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sander Tekelenburg" <st@isoc.nl> >> >>> At 08:19 +0300 UTC, on 2007-07-13, Dmitry Turin wrote: >>> >>>> Good day, Robert. >>>> >>>> RB> I was wondering what character encoding you use to serve up >>>> this page: >>>> RB> <http://html60.chat.ru/site/html60/ru/index_ru.htm> >>>> RB> We're trying to conduct some tests on current UAs and this >>>> page might >>>> RB> be helpful. Do you know what charset it uses? >>>> >>>> All pages in russian language are coded in WIN-1251. >>>> These documents are displayed truely both in IE and Opera. >>> >>> Only because they happen to guess what you intend. They're not >>> presented as >>> you intend in iCab3.0.3, Firefox2.0.0.4, Safari2.0.4 (because >>> neither the >>> server nor the document itself say what character repertoire the >>> document is >>> in). >> >> Sander, that is just a bug. > > I couldn't tell what you were referring to as "a bug" in the above > text. Could you elaborate? Sorry for not being clear enough. It is an author's error to publish document without providing information of what encoding is used in it. Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Friday, 13 July 2007 23:27:49 UTC