- From: Jon Barnett <jonbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 22:28:15 -0500
- To: "Sander Tekelenburg" <st@isoc.nl>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On 7/14/07, Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl> wrote: > Could you send plain text please? I had to manually repair quote indication > and delete inserted HTML. Sorry. Using Gmail. I'll make a habit of sending text/plain to the list if needed. > > [...] context is often equal to fallback. There are cases where the context > >and > >the fallback would be exactly the same > > Could you give an example? I'm having a hard time thinking of one... <img src=cat.jpg alt="A photo of my cat, Fluffy, playing with a ball of yarn"> <p>A photo of my cat, Fluffy, playing with a ball of yarn</p> figure/legend helps with this by directly associating the photo with the description Expecting me to provide that @alt attribute along with the following paragraph seems silly and redundant. If that's not what I should provide for @alt, then it should be crystal clear what I should provide as @alt > > > I think better defining the markup for a semantic "equivalent" vs. a > >semantic "alternate" is more useful than defining markup for "long" vs. > >"short". > > Sorry, you've lost me. I don't know what "long vs short" refers to, and don't > understand what "semantic equivalent vs semantic alternate" means. Most of this thread has been about various ways of providing "short" alternative in addition to a "long" alternative, such as using @alt and @longdesc together, and using a hypothetical <object alt='...'> attribute in addition to the contents of alt. I thing this confuses the issue of alternative content more than it goes to solve it. I think the more relevant issue is "descriptions" of media vs. "equivalents" to media. Were the examples I gave not clear enough as to what I meant? > > Are the contents of <object> an equivalent or a description? Both, in > >certain cases? > > In HTML 4.01 the content of <object> is the equivalent content: I suspect that most commonly in the wild, the contents of <object> are actually a description of the media instead of an actual equivalent to the media. It would be interesting to gather data on this. Is there a convenient way for me to search the code of existing pages on the web. -- Jon Barnett
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2007 03:28:19 UTC