- From: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:48:31 -0500
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Nested <em> elements: Are nested <em> elements, something authors need? I think the recommendation should say more than past recommendations on nesting, but I'm not sure nesting <em> element to indicate even more emphasis is all that useful. However, If we do include this perhaps we could make two (or some specified number) nested <em> elements equivalent to one <strong> which could therefore be deprecated. (This would be preferable to introducing a new <strong> element with a new meaning of importance. Instead consider introducing <important>, <term> or <keyword>; but that's off-topic for this mini-review). Anger: The examples are good, except the last one with the mix of anger. I didn't understand the anger part. This is a good example of nested emphasis, but I'm still not sure it works or how it works for anger. quote from draft: Anger mixed with emphasising the cuteness could lead to markup such as: <p><em>Cats are <em>cute</em> animals!</em></p> unquote.
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2007 13:49:09 UTC