- From: Sander Tekelenburg <st@isoc.nl>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 23:12:21 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
At 23:15 +1000 UTC, on 2007-07-28, Ben Boyle wrote: > On 7/28/07, Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: >> Agreed, but user agents need to, imho, also be able to make sense of the >> markup/content associations [...] > > Take your typical YouTube page. [...] > > You could group the video, it's heading and all the metadata about it > together using <article>. [...] > > You can indicate other page elements are NOT related by using: > 1. other <section> elements, maybe <header> and <footer> for the > YouTube page design bits > 2. <nav> for all the navigational bits that aren't related to this video > 3. <aside> for bits that are "tangentially" related Š maybe comments, > maybe related videos Š Agreed. HTML5 offers a great improvement in defining the relation between complimentary content. But I don't see how any of these features allow authors to definite of the relationships between equivalents. -- Sander Tekelenburg The Web Repair Initiative: <http://webrepair.org/>
Received on Saturday, 28 July 2007 21:20:08 UTC