- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:49:45 +1000
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Sam Ruby wrote: > I know that Lachlan will disagree with the next statement, but I > believe that such an effort needs to be pragmatic, and take into > consideration the utility, risk, *and* demand (and yes, that's the > Pokemon argument) for each property. Actually, that's not the pokemon test and I don't disagree. The pokemon test is a subjective comparison between two items (X and Y), with the assertion that if X is worthy enough, then Y must be also. Whereas, considering the utility, risk and demand for something is a way of objectively judging it on its own merits, which is exactly what needs to be done. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2007 10:50:05 UTC