- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:18:25 +0900
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, public-html@w3.org
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:09:28 +0900, Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net> wrote: > first of all, it's not alternate, but equivalent content that is > needed, and for it to be effective for certain user groups, it > will be necessary to break out of the toggle mindset (load > images/do not load images) for their need is a side-by-side > explication of the still image, not a choice between the image > and rich fallback content Just to clarify this use case a bit (I will do so on the Wiki as well). There are many people who have partial vision - which comes in a lot of flavours. Sometimes they can make out the image, sometimes not. When a page was designed with a graphical vision in mind, being able to see that is valuable - but sometimes you also need the help provided by the equivalent content. The list of reasons why this might apply is long and involved, but can include factors such as colour balance, contrast, image detail, position on the page, as well as external features of the user's current environment. cheers Chaals -- Charles McCathieNevile, Opera Software: Standards Group hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk chaals@opera.com Catch up: Speed Dial http://opera.com
Received on Saturday, 14 July 2007 12:18:55 UTC