- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 18:08:57 +0200
- To: "Philip TAYLOR" <Philip-and-LeKhanh@royal-tunbridge-wells.org>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:50:31 +0200, Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org> wrote: > Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> How realstic is it to expect people to provide alternate content for >> their Flash content? > > If we don't give the hooks so to do, totally unreasonable. There's a hook: <object>. > If we give them the hooks, and they lose sales or > end up in court because they don't use them, > not only "reasonable" but the probability > that they will provide alternate content for > their Flash content is extremely high. Forcing people to do stuff in this way seems like a bad idea. It also only works for large corperations, not for your average weblog. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Sunday, 1 July 2007 16:09:06 UTC