- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:25:50 +0100
- To: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
Robert Burns wrote: > Would you mind trying something like this for fallback: > <picture src="Acid2.png"> <object data="Acid2.png"> <param name="src" > value="Acid2.png" >fallback </object> </picture> Just as I think the current debate about what one might call the XML serialisation of HTML 5 is both premature and (to be honest) rather pointless, I also think that worrying about the /names/ of elements is much in the same category. That said, every time I read <picture> I wince, because so many images are /not/ pictures in any sense. I wonder if we might tentatively adopt <graphic> as the name of a container element to augment the current functionality of <img> Philip Taylor
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 13:26:16 UTC