- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:35:50 +0900
- To: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Cc: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org, wai-xtech@w3.org
Le 30 juil. 2007 à 22:10, Lachlan Hunt a écrit :
> Now this is where there is a serious misunderstanding between us,
> that seems to be causing the conflict. I'm not arguing that it is
> or isn't, I'm questioning the possibility and looking for evidence
> to show one way or the other. From my authoring perspective,
> explicit associations increase complexity for authors, and so if
> explicit associations can be avoided, they should be. If not, then
> we should try and find the simplest way possible to express the
> association.
Mechanisms for creating explicit associations in HTML, trying to be
very general. So we can see what kind of authoring pattern is the
easiest.
* links
A document A links to a resource B somewhere on the network.
<link rel="stylesheet"
href="http://example.org/foo.css"
type="text/css"
media="screen"/>
* nested elements
A nested element A is defined to have a "meaningful" relationship
with the nesting element B.
<object…
<p>…content…</p>
</object>
* Attribute values
The value of an attribute defines the element it belongs too.
<p title="value"> …content… </p>
* anchors
Two elements in a page are associated by a anchor
<cite><a href="#anais">Anais</a></cite>
…
<p id="anais">Anaïs Nin (February 21, 1903 - January 14, 1977) was
a French-born author of Spanish, Cuban, and Danish</p>
Others?
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2007 05:35:58 UTC