- From: scott lewis <sfl@scotfl.ca>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 07:00:46 -0600
- To: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: HTML Working Group <public-html@w3.org>
On 9 Jul 2007, at 0625, Robert Burns wrote: > Hi Scott, > > [..] > > I'm not sure exactly how you're accomplishing this, but the fact > that you say Firefox refuses to process, this tells me you must > have discovered something interesting. I think I asked this before, > but are you performing a file-by-file MIME type setting on your > server? Otherwise how else are you altering your filename > extensions and still serving the same MIME type (or I guess this > could be accomplished incrementally one test at a time). Anyway, my > guess is (and this I think is an interesting discovery if its true) > that IE is ignoring the server MIME type and using the filename > extension instead. Firefox too may be doing something like that > which would cause it to fail (because it doesn't match its > preconceived notions of what a filename extension an XML file > should have). > > I'm curious to hear some more details. Nothing more exotic than Lighttpd running locally with a fixed mimetype of application/xhtml+xml for .html and .xml. IE and Firefox seem to be dispatching the file based on the extension. IE displays a standard 'I won't render XML documents' message when the file ends in .xml. FF displays a "Save To Disk/Open With..." dialog (identifying the document type as "HyperText") if the file ends in .html. s.
Received on Monday, 9 July 2007 13:00:57 UTC