- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 22:51:03 +0100
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > > Lachlan Hunt wrote: > >> That's technically true, but in this case, we already have at least 3 >> native implementations in Firefox, Opera and Safari > > Sorry to drag this on, but...if this is a valid path for discussion, > then, compare table headers attribute and their implementation in JAWS > etc. Why is THAT implementation less important than that of canvas? It is a valid reasoning and is an advantage of the headers attribute over other solutions that meet that use case. However it does not follow that if <canvas> is accepted over scripting+<img> (the only serious alternative I remember being suggested for scripted production of bitmaps; SVG is used for an entirely different type of drawing that meets different needs and is substantially more complex to implement), headers must therefore be included ahead of any proposed alternatives; it also depends on the other arguments for and against the proposed solutions. -- "Mixed up signals Bullet train People snuffed out in the brutal rain" --Conner Oberst
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2007 21:51:06 UTC