Re: handling fallback content for still images

On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:49:51 +0200, Robert Burns <> wrote:
> The irrationality isn't the arguments you listed. Its the merry-go-round  
> of essentially saying that the spec should forbid these practices,  
> followed by the no it shouldn't forbid it. In other words it should  
> forbid it and it should not forbid it.

What I meant with not forbidding is that there is an alternative for <img  
alt> that does allow markup fallback: <object>. I thought I made that  
clear. Sorry for the confusion.

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 17:07:37 UTC