Re: Summary: Naming Issue, Proposals

Dão Gottwald:
> They're all awful. XHTML 1.5 is the only alternative that I see (I was 
> just about to propose that until I that it was done before).
> Besides, since XHTML2 has its own namespace, I don't think the XHTML2 WG
> is in the position to tell us to not call the XML serialisation of any
> HTML version "XHTML". FWIW, their language identifier is "XHTML2" to
> which they should consequentially append any version number, e.g.
> "XHTML2 1.0". As a reasult, "XHTML 5" (with a space!) is still on option
> for us.

While this thread is still around, I might point out this page, which
deals with TR version numbers:

Cameron McCormack,  ▪  ICQ 26955922  ▪  MSN

Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 23:56:05 UTC