- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:20:17 -0400
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 01:52:51 +0200, Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com> wrote: >> Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> 2. Syndication is also addressed by <style scope>. >> >> Fully disagree. > > I said "also". Could you please elaborate on why you disagree with that? "Addressed" means dealt with, as in solved. For this to be true, a substantial portion of the popular feed consumers would need to support this element. At this point in time, that seems a bit presumptuous. >> But, FWIW, your point would have a bit more credibility to me if you >> created html5lib sanitization test cases and code to match. > > If someone creates a CSS parser library it should be quite "easy" to > filter stuff. Most HTML sanitization is done today without a full blown HTML parser. Why do you presume that people will be happy to prereq a full blown CSS parser? > --Anne van Kesteren > <http://annevankesteren.nl/> > <http://www.opera.com/> - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 12:20:45 UTC