- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 12:42:24 -0500
- To: public-html@w3.org
- Cc: "Robert Burns" <rob@robburns.com>
On 7/3/07, Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 3 Jul 2007, at 08:32, Robert Burns wrote: > > > Again, this should be something fairly trivial to summarize for > > long-time participants in the process (for strong memorable > > rationales). It would be extremely cumbersome and perhaps even > > futile for those of us who did not participate in the original > > WhatWG to read through this lengthy record. > > Even if we summarise the reasons, we'll undoubtedly be asked why we > came to such a conclusion, Maybe so, but at least it would be a start in adding some substance to the justification wiki pages for adding/dropping/changing attributes and elements. If everyone contributed a little to the wiki, it could really add up. Right now there is little to no justification for adding/dropping/changing any attributes and elements (with a few exceptions like headers and the accessibility issues). > in which case the mailing lists will need > to be read. According to the editor [1] all issues must be tracked on _this_ mailing list for the editors to pay attention to them. He said: > Do not include any content on the wiki page that wasn't first > posted to this mailing list. (NOR principle) Best Regard, Laura
Received on Tuesday, 3 July 2007 17:42:32 UTC