- From: Joshue O Connor <joshue.oconnor@cfit.ie>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:52:53 +0100
- To: Robert Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Robert Burns wrote: > [...]I'll just add that UAs not expect <img> to be empty. So we can't place any content inside the <img> tags. [...] Thanks for that, I have found both yours and Henri's (terse) feedback useful. >> Rob, are you saying that you would like to see <object> used as a fully >> interoperable element with all the various APIs that can handle <video> >> ,<audio> etc instead of having <video>, <audio> etc in the spec? > > Yes, I would. And I would like to see it capable of achieving that with the simplest syntax, like: > > <object data='afile' >alternate content</object> Looks good to me too. I guess I would still like to see methods that work continue to be supported while the machinery for the Brave New World gets rolled out. > I don't do web development for a living, Well for an economist you sure could do a mean sideline in development/accessibility :-) Cheers Josh
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 15:53:17 UTC