- From: Dmitry Turin <html60@narod.ru>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:23:13 +0300
- To: public-html@w3.org
Good day, Dro. DT> <a src="a/b/c/d.htm#:body.h1[3]+h2[2]+h3[5]+p[8]"> DG> http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr/ (1.1) Xptr does not have abbreviated syntax for 'following-sibling', especially for so combination with it, as following-sibling::*/descendant-or-self::TAG[position()=1] Thus mark plus is necessary for usability. (1.2) Mark plus has the different meaning, than following-sibling::*/descendant-or-self::TAG[position()=1] because last expression finds several TAG, but mark plus finds only _first_ TAG. Thus mark plus is necessary for functionality. (2) Expressions with function 'contains' is less usable (is more bulky), than expression with braces <a href="./a.htm#:h3{part of header}"> <a href="./a.htm#:img{k/m/n/pic.jpg}"> Imagine 'contains' in path ! (3) There is no visual comfort, if path-es before and after #: use identical separator slash. It's necessary to prefer different separators, e.g. slash before and dot after for usability, i.e. it's necessary to prefer <a href="a/b/c/d.htm#:html.body.p.em"> over <a href="a/b/c/d.htm#:html/body/p/em"> Dmitry Turin HTML6 (6.1.0) http://html60.chat.ru SQL4 (4.1.0) http://sql40.chat.ru Computer2 (2.0.2) http://computer20.chat.ru
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2007 06:52:02 UTC