- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:09:28 -0400
- To: public-html@w3.org
first of all, it's not alternate, but equivalent content that is needed, and for it to be effective for certain user groups, it will be necessary to break out of the toggle mindset (load images/do not load images) for their need is a side-by-side explication of the still image, not a choice between the image and rich fallback content -- both MUST be, at the very least, programmatically available to the user; that is, both the image and the rich description thereof should not be an either/or proposition, but a "let the user decide how to expose rich content" question... i have outlined the requirements and user scenarios that call for flexible use of rich equivalent content both on list and on the working group's wiki: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Jun/0645.html http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/LongdescRetention gregory. ------------------------------------------------------------------ SYLLOGISM, n. A logical formula consisting of a major and a minor assumption and an inconsequent. -- Ambrose Bierce ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus@hicom.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/ UBATS - United Blind Advocates for Talking Signs: http://ubats.org ------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Saturday, 14 July 2007 02:09:34 UTC